Infographic: Predicting Earthquakes in Europe

Home Infographics Infographic: Predicting Earthquakes in Europe

How can Europe protect itself from earthquakes when prediction remains an inexact science?

European Earthquakes

In the 1970s, scientists thought they were close to developing a reliable method for predicting earthquakes. But they proved too optimistic: it remains extremely difficult to anticipate the time, location, and magnitude of earthquakes with any precision.

In the absence of progress, resources have been channelled into forecasting based on probabilities for given locations. “Seismologists generally configure hazard in terms of some parameter of ground shaking,” explains British seismologist Roger Musson. “That’s because the effects of a moderate earthquake close to buildings could be similar to a large one further out.”

Forecasts matter not only for those who draw up preparedness plans. They are the best tools for improving building codes, insurance-rate structures and public policy. With earthquakes responsible for 35% of all economic losses from natural disasters, the right investments in infrastructure are crucial.

Three unexpected European temblors


1 November 1755

Type: Interplate Megathrust

Epicentre: Atlantic Ocean, about 200 km WSW of Cape St. Vincent

Damage: 85% of Lisbon’s buildings destroyed

Fatalities: 10,000–100,000

Magnitude: 8.5–9.0 Mw



18 October 1356

Type: Intraplate Epicentre: Between Waldkirch and St. Peter in the Black Forest

Damage: All major churches and castles within a 30-km radius of Basel destroyed

Fatalities: At least 300

Magnitude: 6.2–6.5 Mw



gas field, NL Since 1986

Type: Man-made Epicentre: Near Slochteren

Damage: Adverse long-term outlook on structural integrity of buildings

Magnitude: Largest to date, 3.6 Mw (16 August 2013)

100 years of Italian earthquakes

Astride the African and Eurasian plates, approaching at 6 mm a year, Italy is at high risk.

Italy Earthquakes

Top 20 European cities at risk

Cities at risk

*The Risk Score was created by assigning to each city a score between 0 and 1 for both population and forecast ground movement; multiplying those two produces the overall score. Since risk reflects not only the force of shaking ground, but also the proximity of people and buildings, only cities with a population above 50,000 were included.

Top 5 cities at risk worldwide

Inside a seismograph

Typical instruments comprise a triaxial broadband seismometer and 24-bit digitiser inside a stainless-steel casing. In a triaxial design, three identical motion sensors are set at the same angle to the vertical, but 120° apart on the horizontal. Vertical and horizontal motions can be computed from the outputs of the three sensors.


Infographic: Thibaud Tissot (onlab)
Ben McCluskey, LargeNetwork

Sources: Sources: EU Joint Research Centre, Global Seismic Hazard Assessment Program, Swiss Seismological Service, US Geological Survey, Güralp Systems Ltd


racing catamaran

From an environmental standpoint, marine exploitation has been a catastrophe. New research and technological innovation are showing the way towards…

Taking pictures of thousands of snowflakes from three different angles to improve the accuracy of snowfall measurements and winter weather…

Flammable ice may sound like an oxymoron, but it correctly describes the two faces of methane hydrate. An enticing source…

Solving the world’s plastic problem with waxworms.